



Issues : Rhythmic errors
b. 85
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
Despite the fact that the correct text is actually undeniable, its correct notation in the sources appears only in GE3 (→GE4→GE5). The notation of A is unclear in terms of division into voices (hands), which may have resulted in a rhythmic error of FE (→GE1→GE2, →EE2→EE3). In turn, at the time of adding minim stems in EE4, the G category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 10 No 8, Etude in F major
..
A quaver flag was omitted in the 1st note in the R.H. in FE. This patent error was corrected in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |
|||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
At the end of the bar A has two semiquavers in the L.H., which is undoubtedly a mistake, corrected already in FE1 in all remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 89
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As was the case with b. 69, in most sources (except FESB) the syncopated c2 crotchet is prolonged with two dots, which results in an excessive number of rhythmic values – 5 quavers in the bar. The mistake was noticed and corrected (graphically awkwardly) only in FESB. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||
b. 91
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE (→EE), the duration of the 3rd semiquaver on the last beat of the bar is increased to a crotchet. Going beyond the beat of the bar, which makes no music sense, must be a mistake – cf. analogous bar 52 where the corresponding note is a quaver. In GE, the prolongation of this note was omitted, probably in order to avoid a troublesome, incomprehensible element of notation. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors repeated in EE |