mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 5-9

composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor

Staccato signs in bars 5 and 9 in A (→GE→FE)

No signs in EE
..

Missing in bars 5 and 9 in EE are the staccato dots under D. This is probably the engraver's fault.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE inaccuracies

b. 5-12

composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor

 
 
 
..

Generally, in the sources we encounter 3 variants of slurs within bars 5-12:
- two slurs: the 1st to the end of bar 10, whereas the beginning of the 2nd slur from bar 11 in AO, AK, AG (→CY)
- two slurs: the 1st to the end of bar 8, whereas the beginning of the 2nd slur from bar 9 in AR
- one slur in AE (→CX): in the autograph, one can see a binding between two slurs, at the transition between bars 7 and 8.

CC features two slurs written in bars 5-8 only. The first spans bars 5-7, whereas the second - bar 8. It may be a result of such an interpretation of the aforementioned binding of two slurs in AE by the copyist of a base text, unknown to us, of CC (the closest to the notation of AE).

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

b. 5-6

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

The slur end in  A (→GE→FE→EE)

The editors' proposition
..

The slur in A finally trails off shortly after the minim d flat2, yet we clearly see that Chopin ran out of ink, which suggests that the slur was meant to reach slightly further. This guess finds confirmation in longer slurs in the analogous bars 8 and 10. We resolve the question of whether those slurs reach the semiquaver or extend to the crotchet on the 2nd beat of the bar in favour of the latter option, as those slurs are actually more phrase marks than articulation slurs. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 5

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

A long accent in A

A short accent in GE (→FE→EE)
..

A long accent at the beginning of the bar is very clear in A, having a characteristic shape and a typical size. Nevertheless, a short accent was printed in GE (→FE→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE

b. 5-17

composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor

 marks in A

GE1 (→FE→EE)

GE2 (→GE3)
..

In bars 5, 7, 9 and 13, 15 & 17 in GE1 (→FE→EE) the  marks were placed under the 3rd crotchet. This contradicts the notation of A, in which those asterisks were placed earlier, more or less in the middle of the bar. In GE2 (→GE3) the marks were moved even further towards the end of the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions