data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The missing ties to f in EE1 in bars 4-5 and 14-15 are probably the engraver's mistakes, corrected in EE2. However, it should be mentioned that the FE notation in bars 4-5 is inaccurate, which could have misled the engraver of EE1 – in bar 4 the tie is placed too low, next to the stem, and not the notehead, while in bar 5 the ending of the tie is missing.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in EE
notation: Rhythm