Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 5

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

A long accent in EE and GC

Short accent in FE

Two accents in GE

..

In the main text we give the long accent, as can be seen in EE and GC. The placement and type of accent in FE (a short one above the L.H. minim) may have resulted from difficulties with deciphering the graphics of the hand-written base text. GE has the accent taken from  GC and another one, above the minim c in the L.H. This is certainly a revision, one of many of that type. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 5

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

Missing from GC is the  lowering G to G. The accidental was added in GE, the remaining sources also have it in place.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 5-22

composition: Op. 45, Prelude in C♯ minor

 in FE (→EE)

Our variant suggestion

..

The placement of  marks in bars 5-6 and analogous bars (bars 5-12 and 19-22 on the same page) shows consistent discrepancies between GE and FE (→EE). In the editors' opinion, both pedalling concepts are authentic and may be used in performance practice. For that reason we give the text in which they are shown as variants. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 5-7

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

1 octave in JC

2 octaves in EF

6 octaves in PE

..

Similarly as in bars 1-2, we consider the versions of JC and EF as a result of an erroneous reading of the autograph of the previous version of the Polonaise[AI]. Cf. also the remark concerning bars 3-4

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 5-6

composition: WN 17, Polonaise in B♭ major

No marks in JC & PE

Accents in EF

Our suggestion

..

The accents in EF, as in analogous bars 1-2, are probably Fontana's additions. We propose to complete the dynamic hairpins and accents after the indications of PE in bars 1-2. We adopt a similar procedure in the case of the slurs embracing the motifs in the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions