Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The GE1 and GE2 copies were provided with two types of covers – some gave no information that the piece was intended for piano with orchestra (the phrase "avec accompagnement d'orchestre" was removed). The title page of GE3 explicitly informs us that it is a piece for one piano ("pour le piano seul"). The titles of the remaining editions do not contain a mention of the orchestral accompaniment, although in the case of FE1 (→FE2) one can guess that it is included due to the given prices of the orchestral material (in a full version and in a version reduced to string quartet). category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 30 No. 1, Mazurka in C minor
..
In all sources the number of mazurkas in the opus is expressed in full word – Quatre Mazurkas, yet in the main text we provide a digit, understandable regardless of the language. What is more, it cannot be excluded that in the autograph (lost) Chopin wrote a digit, as he did in the preserved autographs of opuses 24 and 50, which the French publisher did not respect in opus 24, replacing the digit with a word. In FC the title contains a mistake – Quatre Mazurka. The title having been expanded in EE was an arbitrary decision of the publisher – all opuses of Chopinesque Mazurkas were named like that. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Errors of FC |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 63 No. 1, Mazurka in B major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Dedications , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
In GE (→FE) Chopin's dolce was replaced with the abbreviation dol. In EE the full name of the term was restored. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 2-14
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In bars 2-3, 5-6, 10-11 and 13-14 in the main text, we give undeniable wedges written in A (in comparison, Chopin's dots may be seen over the bass notes in bars 1, 5 and analog.). In FE a part of the marks was omitted (in bars 3, 10 and 11) and the rest was interpreted as dots. The changes, according to us, are of a clearly arbitrary nature. GE and EE generally repeat the version of FE, yet they include a dot also in bar 3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Wedges |
