Issues : Errors in EE

b. 411

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In EE1, there is no octave sign over the 1st beat of the bar. The mistake was corrected in subsequent impressions of EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 412-435

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

7 longer, 5 shorter slurs in A

2 longer, 10 shorter slurs in FC

9 longer, 3 shorter slurs in FE

12 shorter slurs in GE

8 longer, 3 shorter slurs in EE

12 longer slurs suggested by the editors

..

In A the slurs over the motifs of the bottom voice encompass the quavers only or reach the minim in the next bar. However, the differences are almost certainly of an accidental nature, hence in the main text we unify them, assuming 6-note slurs to be more frequent in A (7 longer, 2 shorter and 3 questionable). Accidental inaccuracies are also present in the remaining sources, except for GE, in which all slurs encompass 5 notes. The majority of the doubts concerning the range of the slurs is due to the ending lines: a slur suggesting continuation is not finished in a new line (b. 418-419 in A and FC, 432-433 in A, 412-413, 420-421 and 428-429 in FE and b. 422-423 in EE). In such situations we give shorter slurs in our transcriptions, just like in b. 426-427 in A and 412-413 in 428-429 in FC, which may be thought to be dubious. EE omitted the slur in b. 420-421. Neither FC nor FE, EE and GE reproduced the notation of the Stichvorlage correctly; however, the total number of inaccuracies in this section is smaller than the first time (b. 310-333).

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in FC , Uncertain slur continuation

b. 414-415

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

from middle of bar 414 in FE (→GE)

No mark in EE1

from beginning of bar 414 in EE2 (→EE3)

..

The lack of hairpin in EE1 is most probably an oversight. In EE2 (→EE3) a sign spanning the entire two bars was added – cf. note to bars 412-413.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE

b. 418-431

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

4 short accents in EE

13 accents in GC (→GE)

12 accents in FE

Our suggestion (13 accents)

Our alternative suggestion (12 accents)

..

In these bars the question of short or long accents has not beeb resolved. Fortunately enough, a performer who has both options at his disposal is triggered to think about his own idea. The lack of most of the accents in EE must be the engraver's error - the accents end at the beginning a new line of text. The lack of accent in b. 423 in FE is an obvious error too, and we suggest two ways of dealing with it.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in EE

b. 423-424

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

No tie in EE

f tied in GC (→GE) & FE

..

No tie on f in EE must most certainly be an error.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE