b. 3-6
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The notation of e notes as minims, used by Chopin in bars 1-3 and 5-6, despite being formally incorrect in the case of the ones featured in the 2nd half of each of these bars, seems to be completely clear and it was not questioned. However, in bars 3 and 6 the 2nd minim means sustaining e also in the 1st half of bars 4 and 7, based on the B7 chord. Such a harmonic mix was rather not Chopin's aim. In A one can see that the minims were being added and probably the composer mechanically copied the notation, without considering the different harmonic situation. Due to this fact, in the main text we suggest to shorten the last e in bars 3 and 6 to a crotchet. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections |
|||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
EE2 omits accents, which was corrected in EE3 (→EE4), by changing the signs in the 2nd half of the bar for vertical accents. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The version of AI had to be also in [A], as the traces of its deletion are visible in FE. Similarly in bar 53, as well as in bars 11 and 61. The corrections visible in the discussed bar in AI prove that from the outset Chopin wavered as to the L.H. chords positions. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 3-11
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The extensions of every second semiquaver of each fourth in bars 3, 7 and 11 are not marked in AI. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information |
|||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
The version of GE3 (→GE4→GE5) is an example of an error resulting from shifting the note by a third. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |