|
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 27 No 1, Nocturne in C# minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
We give the extent of Cf. the characteristics of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 3
|
composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor
..
The versions differ in the duration of the second value in the L.H. In the autographs, the 3rd beat is a crotchet, in the editions (F) - a minim. The d crotchet on the 1st beat in the L.H. in CX may be considered a copying inaccuracy as well as the dotted minim in CC - those versions are not confirmed by any of the autographs. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 3
|
composition: WN 55, Waltz in F minor
..
The crescendo hairpin in bar 3 is only in FEF and GEF. In all repetitions written out in those two editions, for the 1st and 2nd time, the hairpin in FEF does not reach the last note in the R.H. (like in the miniature), whereas for the 3rd time, its range is identical as in GEF. In turn, FEF features the same range of the hairpin, including the last quaver in the R.H., in all three analogous places. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
It is not clear whether the accent written in A was meant to be a short one or a long one. GE (→FE) has a short accent here, and the inaccurate placement of that mark in FE brought about its erroneous interpretation in EE. However, a comparison with the analogous bars 11, 51 and 59 points to the long accent option as being more probable. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
in 
in line with 
in