Issues : Synchronization markings

b. 38-40

composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

..

Although the notation of the source is clear, there are as many as five signs in FES that show in a detailed manner the rhythmic relations of both hands. Those signs are probably meant to facilitate the a vista playing through showing the synchronization of the L.H. and the R.H. part. Cf. bar 35-36.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Synchronization markings , Annotations in FES

b. 51

composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major

A synchronization mark in FES

No mark entered

..

The marks entered in FES (a line and a cross) point to the moment of beginning of the run that ends the trill.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Synchronization markings , Annotations in FES

b. 55

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

Synchronization sign written into FED

No teaching indication

..

In the main text we give the synchronisation mark that comes from Chopin; it requires the first grace note, e1, to be performed simultaneously with bass E1. The same in b. 199, since due to the defect of FED (missing two pages), the entry in b. 55 is also in b. 199.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Synchronization markings

b. 58

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

 
 
 
..

In FED Chopin added the sign of synchronisation of the R.H. and the L.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Synchronization markings

b. 74

composition: Op. 29, Impromptu in A♭ major

..

In FED Chopin added a sign specifying the manner of performing the trill – synchronisation with the L.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Synchronization markings