Issues : Errors of FC
|
b. 2
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
Fontana's mistake in the interpretation of the slurs of A could have been caused by a slur from the next page of A clearly showing through the paper – a fragment of a slur of the Prelude in C category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
The longer slur of FC (→GE) resulted from a mistake of the copyist, most probably confused by the contour of a fragment of the slur written on the back of this page (over b. 22) blending into the slur of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 3-4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
The inconspicuous little slur of A was overlooked both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). The absence in CGS – see b. 1-9. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The missing accent in FC (→GE) resulted from the distraction of the copyist, who overlooked the marks from the entire first line of A. In FE (→EE) this long accent was reproduced as a half-bar diminuendo hairpin, which more or less corresponds to the length of the mark in A, but does not include the fact that it should be placed under the a1 crotchet only. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||
|
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 5, Prelude in D major
..
In FC (→GE1) the b1-a1 semiquavers are not separated as quavers. The patent mistake of the copyist was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). See also b. 36. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC , Errors repeated in GE |
Minor seems to combine the two slurs of 
in