Issues : Errors in GE
b. 602-603
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
For the main text we adopt the musically indisputable GC hairpins (→GE2, omitted in GE1). The corresponding mark in EE seems to be placed inaccurately - crescendo on the the resounding chord is in fact impossible to execute on the grand piano. No sign in FE may indicate a less carerful edition of execution markings in [A2] (cf. annotation to b. 373)
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , EE inaccuracies |
|||||||||
b. 604
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 605-608
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The slur over these bars exists only in GC in bars 573-576, which here are repeated with a change of the beginning. Since the slur in GC begins in b. 604 on the previous page on the last chord. A question arises here how to connect this slur with a slur over the four-bar section in 605-608. We assume them to be one slur, and as such it is the copied in GE2 (in GE1 there are no slurs in bars 604-607, which is an obvious error. However, another solution may be proposed here where only bars 605-608 are slurred and the slur in b. 604 ends on the sixth beginning in b. 605. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||
b. 605
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in analogous b. 154, the indication , instead of , must be a mistake of the engraver of GE1. The mistake was corrected in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , fz – f |
|||||||||
b. 608
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors |