



b. 9
|
composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version
..
The presence of two volte in bar 24 proves that Chopin envisioned in AsI a repetition of the 2nd part of the variation. In the entire piece, AsI does not include a single standard repeat sign, although in a few places – as is the case here – alternative endings of certain sections prove that repetitions were intended. See also bar 8. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Changed phrase length |
|||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version
..
In AsI the 3rd hemidemisemiquaver in each group is b category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Chopin's hesitations , Accompaniment changes , Corrections of AI |
|||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version
..
AsI includes a few unjustified cautionary accidentals in this bar: a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version
..
The g3 note featured in AsI is compliant with g3 in bar 15, which is a counterpart of bar 11 in the repetition of this four-bar phrase. The idea of diversifying the melodic line here (introduced in A) was then also used in the final version of this variation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Main-line changes |
|||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version
..
In AsI Chopin continues the principal scheme of contrary motion passages one quaver longer. In A version, Chopin made the arrangement of the figures in this bar look like in bar 8. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Accompaniment changes , Main-line changes |