mUltimate Chopin

Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 18-22

composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version

Arpeggios from g1 in AsI

Arpeggios from b1, c2 & b1 in A
..

As in the initial fragment of this variation – see bars 1 and 5 – the initial version of bars 18 and 22 keeps the position of the arpeggio-like figures, which, combined with the melody semiquavers, results in greater leaps.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Accompaniment changes

b. 18-22

composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version

..

As in bars 2 and 6, in A there are no accidentals to the last hemidemisemiquaver of the 2nd and 4th R.H. figures in bars 18 and 22, a  (b2) and a  (b2), respectively. In AsI these accidentals are not necessary, since in the version of this manuscript, the aforementioned notes are absent. On the other hand, there is no  to the 2nd note in the 2nd L.H. figure in bar 18 (b). In this context, the patent inaccuracies do not raise any doubts concerning the text.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in A

b. 20

composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version

f1-e1-c1 in 1st & 4th group in AsI

f1-c1-a in 1st & 4th group in A
..

In AsI the version of the 4th L.H. figure is the initial version – cf. bar 4. Meanwhile, the notation of the 1st figure is most probably erroneous – an e seventh never occurs at the beginning of a 4th bar, neither in the theme nor in any variation. The mistake is also indicated by the way the 4 identical groups were written down – the first 2 are written out with notes, while the abbreviations marking a repetition start only just from the 3rd figure, which suggests that the first two were not supposed to be identical.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Accompaniment changes

b. 20

composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version

..

We add a cautionary  before e1 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 20

composition: Op. 2, Variation IV, primitive version

e1-c1 & a1-c2 in AsI

d1-b & b1-d2 in A
..

The sound of the 3rd group in AsI is a puzzle in this bar. In the L.H. part, a repetition of the preceding figure is marked, hence a broken dominant chord in the key of B major (the 4th figure is also marked as a repetition, which confirms such an interpretation). In the R.H. part the middle hemidemisemiquavers bear traces of corrections – it seems that Chopin changed the initial b1 and d2 notes to a1 and c2. Consequently, all 4 figures in this bar are identical in both hands, which is contrary to the characteristic harmonic sequence with a tonic chord on the 3rd quaver in the bar, present in the orchestral part (both in AsI and in the printed orchestral parts), the A text in this place and the text of all sources in analogous bar 4. According to us, we are most probably dealing with Chopin's mistake (cf. the first note in this bar).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Corrections of AI