Issues : Inaccuracies in GE
b. 61
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The shortening of the sign in editions is most likely due to inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Scope of dynamic hairpins |
|||||||||||||||
b. 64
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we give the slur of A, compliant with the slurs in the subsequent appearances of this motif. The slur of GE1 and the remaining editions, starting earlier, must be an inaccuracy, although it is difficult to say whether it was a routine revision or a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||||||
b. 94
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI there are two versions of the group of demisemiquavers: a 4-note one, as in bar 78, and a supplemented 6-note version, as in the remaining sources – see the note above. The meaning of the arc entered under this group is not clear – we assume that it is a tie to a1, but it is possible that it was intended to be a slur referring to demisemiquavers. The range and meaning of the corresponding slur in A and GE1 (→GE2) are also unclear; consequently, each source can be interpreted twofold. Moreover, in GE (→FE,EE,FESB) a second slur was added over the group (most probably arbitrarily). All in all, there are 4 different combinations of slurs, out of which to the main text we choose the slur of A, interpreted literally. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Triplet slurs |
|||||||||||||||
b. 104
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The engraver of GE (→FE,EE,FESB) placed the hairpin under the cresc. indication, which may suggest that it concerns the L.H. part. It must be an arbitrary change, hence in the main text we keep the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||||||
b. 107-108
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
At the end of b. 107, it is uncertain which R.H. voices the slurs of A concern – practically, each combination of two out of three voices is possible. On the basis of a comparison with analogous b. 123, we assume that they concern the two bottom voices. This is how it was interpreted, more or less, in GE (→FE,EE), in which, however, the top slur begins only just over the last semiquaver, while the bottom one reaches d1 and not b1 at the beginning of b. 108. The notation was further distorted in FESB. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FESB |