Rhythm
|
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 30-32
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As before, FE, and particularly EE1, distorted the notation of the accompaniment by placing some (FE) or all (EE1) dotted crotchets directly next to the minims, which suggests that they should be performed simultaneously. In EE2 (→EE3), the misleading notation of EE1 has been partially corrected. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 30
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
According to the editors, the lack of a tie to g category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 37-38
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The missing ties to g1 in these bars could be easily considered oversights of the engraver of GE (→FE,EE), particularly since they are poorly visible in A. However, 4 bars later, in an analogous phrase, the respective ties to c2 are present neither in the editions nor in A, which makes us consider possible Chopinesque corrections to the discussed bars in GE1. According to us, it is also highly likely that even if the ties were overlooked, Chopin accepted repeated g1, resulting in an ability to shape more dynamic nuances in this fragment, of a clearly agitato nature. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 41-42
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Due to the reasons discussed in b. 37-38 (the ties could have been overlooked by Chopin), we consider the version of AsI an acceptable variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A |
3 repeated in 
before this crotchet is definitely an error).
