![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
b. 114
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In FE1, there are 3 crotchets in the bottom voice, which is a mistake (we reproduce them in our system in the "transcript" version only), which was corrected in FE2 by adding a quaver beam combining all 3 notes. We give this version, probably the latest authentic one, in the main text. See also the note at the end of the bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 182-183
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 184
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI the ornament, added probably later, is provided with a draft and not entirely clear form; however, it is most probably None of the sources includes a mark that would specify the sound of the ornament's top note. The prevailing key in b. 184-190, F major, requires the use of e2, which in the main text we indicate with naturals. Omissions of accidentals in similar situations is a rule rather than an exception in Chopin's pieces – apparently, the composer believed that the sense of key would suggest the right note to the performer. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Placement of markings , FE revisions , , |
|||||||||
b. 192
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As the last demisemiquaver, FE erroneously has the octave a-a1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 207
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The additional wedge in GE is, according to the editors, most likely a mistake by the engraver of GE1 – there is no reason why Chopin's possible addition of marks should only apply to the L.H. In turn, omission of the last R.H. wedge in FE is probably a side effect of the correction of the pitch of this quaver – see the adjacent note. The absence of 3 out of 5 wedges in FESB is most likely the result of the carelessness of the engraver of this edition. In the main text we provide wedges according to A, taking into account Chopin's correction of the last quaver introduced in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , |