b. 314
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in the R.H. part, in the main text we include – in brackets – the fingering of AsI, which is an extended version of the one that Chopin wrote in A (→GE→FE,EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 314
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary before d1 in the L.H. chord. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 314-315
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we keep the precise slurring of A. The slurs having been separated on the bar line was an arbitrary decision of GE (→FE,EE). category imprint: issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 315
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we keep the two staccato dots visible in A over the f notes opening the semiquaver triplets. The fact that the first one was omitted in GE (→FE) most probably resulted from lack of space under the R.H. b semiquaver written on the bottom stave (in EE a wedge was added under this f). The second dot having been replaced by a wedge must have been an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1 – see bars 271-272. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||||||
b. 315
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The three bass octaves are provided with staccato marks in A. Only the first one is a dot, which seems to be Chopin's inadvertence – it is supported by both the next two L.H. wedges and the R.H. wedges in these places. In this case, we consider the unification process carried out by GE to be justified and adopt it to the main text. The omission of the second mark in GE1 (→GE2) must have resulted from lack of space; the wedge was added in GE3. The easiest explanation for the fact that the versions of FE and EE are devoid of marks would be oversights. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |