Page:
Source:
p. 5, b. 74-90
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
A comparison of four R.H. slurs in b. 85 and 89 suggests that the second slur in b. 85 in A is either inaccurate or incomplete (the actual beginning of the slur may be imperceptible on the photograph). It cannot be excluded that some changes were made in the stage of proofreading FE, in which the range of this slur corresponds to the range of its counterpart in b. 89. Due to the above, in the main text we give the slur of FE (→GE,EE), unquestionable in terms of both sources and style.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccurate slurs in A, Authentic corrections of FE
notation: Slurs
Missing markers on sources:
A, FE1, FE2, FED, GE1, GE2, GE3, GE4, GE1a, EE1, EE2, EE3