|
b. 207
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A (→FE→GE), there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||
|
b. 207
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, one can see numerous deletions in the L.H. part in this bar – it was only the initial octave that was not changed. Chopin deleted individual crotchets to eventually cross out the entire 2nd half of the bar and write the final version of the last three crotchets on an adjacent stave (below). We present a possible transcription of the main L.H. stave, taking into account a possible interpretation of the deleted crotchets:
category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||||
|
b. 208
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The lack of a dot is almost certainly an oversight of the engraver of FE (→GE,EE). The mark is near the end of the slur and can be considered part of it. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||
|
b. 214
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
On the basis of the available photograph of A, it is difficult to say whether the chord at the beginning of the bar includes e category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Uncertain notes on ledger lines |
|||||
|
b. 216
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The deletion visible in A reveals that Chopin initially wrote a crotchet stem for the a category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A |
raising f1 to f
1. The inaccuracy, typical of Chopin, was corrected only by 
. We would like to point out that the interpretation on the basis of the available photograph is subject to a great deal of uncertainty. Above all, we assume that the deleted crotchets were dyads and not, e.g. triads. The latter cannot be excluded, yet it seems that Chopin was looking for the best position and maybe also shape of this accompanying figure. To guess the initial version on the basis of this notation, we must first determine which of the seven crotchets written there constituted it. According to us, there are two possible approaches:
. This solution, seemingly obvious and musically reasonable, is seriously flawed – it requires an explanation: why would Chopin leave such a big gap between the 2nd and the 5th crotchets when writing this version on an empty stave. After all, he could not have reserved some space for later corrections. We consider the following explanation to be likely – Chopin 'blithely' entered the first half of the bar (bass and crotchets 1 and 2), ignoring the relation to the R.H.; it was only after he had realised that the parts of both hands were out of sync that he wrote the second half correctly. When he later decided to lower the position of this figure – most probably adjusting it to the position of the accompaniment in the next bar – he used the free space to enter the first two crotchets of the final version (nos. 3 and 4) and he crossed out the 2nd half of the bar and wrote the next three crotchets under the deletion.
. In this case, one has to assume that the corrections were carried out in two stages. First, crotchet 2 was replaced by crotchet 1, crotchet 3 was added and crotchet 5 was removed: 
. In the second stage, Chopin would delete crotchet 1 and the entire 2nd half of the bar, which he wrote on the stave below in a new version.
1 in 