b. 4
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text we omit the additional slur over the triplet entered into A – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 16. The slur was omitted (removed?) already in FE (→GE,EE). In the next bar, Chopin omitted such a slur already in A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Triplet slurs |
||||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
We add cautionary naturals before f1 and f2 in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, the hairpin is placed closer to the top stave; however, it is under the L.H. slur. Therefore, one can ponder to which part the mark refers, i.e. R.H. or L.H. According to us, the range of the mark, perfectly corresponding to the g1-b1 step, indicates that the mark applies to the R.H. part. Such ascending motifs, usually within the interval of a second, are often to be found in Chopin's works, while the accompanying marks were often misinterpreted by the engravers of the first editions (just like here), cf., e.g. the Concerto in F minor, Op. 21, II mov., b. 84 or the Prelude in A minor, Op. 28 No. 2, b. 15-16. In FE (→GE,EE) the hairpin was put in a neutral place, i.e. between the right and the left hand, but it was extended to the entire three-note motif. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The long accent entered into A was quite accurately reproduced in FE; however, GE and EE considered it vague and reduced to a more typical form, i.e. a diminuendo hairpin in GE and a common short accent in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The version of GE may be either a revision of this edition (cf. the comment on b. 45-47) or a variation introduced by Chopin (e.g. along with Lento – cf. the comment on b. 1). The vast majority of arguments are for the former, i.e. for this chord being arbitrarily revised in GE:
Therefore, in the main text we give e1, considering d1 a variant of uncertain authenticity. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |