data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE1
compare
The slurs added by EE (in the L.H. part) over the d1-c1 motifs in b. 195-196 and the d1-e1 motifs in b. 199-200 were arbitrarily added during the revision of EE, what is more, inconsistently – slurs were not added in b. 201-205.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions
notation: Pitch