data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
![]() |
Slurs from 2nd note in A, literal reading |
|
|
||
|
Different slurs suggested by the editors |
It is uncertain where the L.H. slurs should start in these bars. In A, it seems that the slurs run from the 2nd crotchet of the bar, but the interpretation of A on the basis of a photograph is always prone to error. On the other hand, the engraver of FE (→GE,EE) would often put slurs in a routine manner, adjusting them to the rhythmic structures (e.g. in b. 32-33, 35 or 37-39). In the main text we adopt a hybrid solution, i.e. we consider only the slur of A in b. 69 to be inaccurate (cf. the unequivocal slur in identical b. 77). The source versions can be regarded as equal variants.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE, Inaccurate slurs in A
notation: Slurs