Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 8-19

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

..

In A, it can be seen that Chopin initially wrote over the characteristic quaver figure slurs that would not go beyond the bar line; it was only later that he prolonged them, leading them to the minims at the beginning of the following bar. Such corrections are clear in b. 8-9, 10-11, 12-13 and 18-19.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A

b. 9-21

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

No L.H. slurs in A (→FEGE,EE1EE2)

L.H. slurs in EE3

..

In A (→FEGE,EE1EE2), the L.H. crotchets are provided with inconsistent articulation markings – in addition to the ubiquitous staccato dots, the pairs of crotchets in the 2nd half of b. 10, 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 are also provided with a slur. When interpreted literally, the articulation deviates from the one indicated for the respective R.H. crotchets, which are consistently marked with both dots and slurs. However, there are no doubts that in this texture, based on the juxtaposition of the melodic top R.H. voice with the rhythmic and harmonic accompaniment performed by both hands, all elements of the crotchet chords are to be played with the same articulation. In the original layout, the slurs encompassing the pairs of the R.H. crotchets are placed above them, which naturally suggests that they also refer to the L.H. crotchets. Chopin would often reach for such a simplified notation – cf., e.g. the middle section of the Mazurka in A major, Op. 50 No. 2, in which the performance of the L.H. part, devoid of markings, must include the indications written in the R.H. Should we assume such an interpretation, it becomes clear why there are slurs in the L.H. part in the aforementioned bars – in those places the crotchet accompaniment is in the L.H. only.
In the main text we move the markings concerning the R.H. crotchets under the stave, which ensures better readability of the R.H. part; at the same time, it visually excludes the L.H. part from the impact of those markings. Therefore, to avoid any doubts, we give slurs over all L.H. crotchets. In analogous b. 95-99 Chopin himself, while proofreading FE1, supplemented his original notation in this way. This solution was also adopted by EE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 14

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

..

We add a cautionary  before e1 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 14-15

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

Slur to b. 15 in A, literal reading (→FEGE,EE)

Slur to end of b. 14 in A, contextual interpretation

..

In A, the R.H. slur in the 2nd half of b. 14, when interpreted literally, ends at the beginning of b. 15, and this is how it was reproduced in FE (→GE,EE). According to us, however, it is merely an inaccuracy of Chopin's notation, since the composer would write the majority of the slurs in this Ballade with a flourish.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 14-16

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

..

In A, one can see deletions of the bottom notes on the 2nd and 3rd crotchets in b. 14 and 16. Initially, they looked as follows: e1-b1-c2 and c1-e1-g1, respectively. See also b. 23.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes