



Page:
Source:
p. 4, b. 49-64
Main text
Prezentacja
Select
copy link
Main text

As is the case with the remaining similar bars, in FE (→EE) it is only the top note of the 1st R.H. octave that is separated as a crotchet. It must be a mistake, which is proven by the dots prolonging both notes of the octaves in analogous b. 36-40. To the main text we adopt the undoubtedly correct notation of GE.
Compare the passage in the sources»
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE
notation: Rhythm
Missing markers on sources:
GE1, GE2, FE1, FE2, EE1, EE2, EE3, FES