FE1
compare
b. 62-64
As is the case with the remaining similar bars, in FE (→EE) it is only the top note of the 1st R.H. octave that is separated as a crotchet. It must be a mistake, which is proven by the dots prolonging both notes of the octaves in analogous b. 36-40. To the main text we adopt the undoubtedly correct notation of GE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FE
notation: Rhythm