Issues : Inaccuracies in FE
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As with the other similar bars, in FE (→EE) it is only the top note of the 1st R.H. octave that is separated as a crotchet, which is a mistake. To the main text we adopt the notation of GE, which is undoubtedly correct. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||
b. 295
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In GE and FE1 there is no accidental to the bottom note of the L.H. chord on the 3rd beat of the bar (d). FE2 and EE added a , which we include in the main text. This and other additions were also introduced in b. 296-297. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , FE revisions |
|||
b. 296-297
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In GE and FE1 there are no accidentals to the d notes (in various octaves) on the 3rd beat of both bars. The remaining editions added the following naturals:
In the main text we include only the L.H. accidentals. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||
b. 296-299
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As with the other similar bars, in FE (→EE) it is only the top note of the R.H. octaves (written down in two-part notation) that is separated as a crotchet. It must be a mistake, hence to the main text we adopt the notation of GE, which is undoubtedly correct. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||
b. 296-297
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the revision of EE2 (→EE3) due to the authentic dots in the next two bars and in analogous b. 37-38. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |