Slurs
|
b. 144-145
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The additional slur is an arbitrary revision by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 147-150
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In accordance with the explanation in the note to b. 127, in the main text we follow FE and suggest adding a slur (in square brackets) in the second pair of bars. The missing slur in EE may be explained by an oversight of the engraver; however, due to the absence of the discussed bars in FE1, it cannot be ruled out that the slur had already been absent in that edition. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 159-161
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 159-161
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
A comparison with analogous b. 140-141 indicates that it is the oversight that is the most likely reason for the absence of the tie to e in GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 162-163
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The slur of the majority of the sources was probably inaccurately written by Chopin in [A]. It could also be the initial version, left by inadvertence, changed in the remaining places at the time of writing [A]. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a longer slur, compliant with all analogous bars (142-143 and 201-202). The slurring of those places was similarly standardised in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
