Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 186-189

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No marks in GE & FE (→EE)

Staccato dots suggested by editors

..

In accordance with the explanation in the note to b. 127, in the main text we suggest adding articulation markings (in square brackets) after b. 127-130 and 147-148. We also add slurs (see the adjacent note).

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 190-195

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

6 bars of staccato in GE1

2 bars of staccato in FE

2 staccato dots in EE

No marks in GE2

..

The difference between GE1 and FE in the number of bars featuring staccato markings for the L.H. crotchets does not influence the performance – in both cases the marks serve as a model, and the articulation is valid throughout the entire section until b. 197. To the main text we adopt the more accurate notation of GE1. The reduced number of dots in EE probably resulted from the engraver's inaccuracy, whereas the omission of the marks in GE2 is rather a revision (cf. b. 151-158).
See also b. 196-197 and 210-215.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 196-197

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No marks in GE & EE

Staccato dot in FE

Dots suggested by the editors

..

The single staccato dot at the beginning of b. 196 in FE could have resulted from a mistake; however, it could have been added to remind us of the different articulation between the parts of both hands in a situation in which Chopin moved the majority of the R.H. part to the bottom stave (we do not reproduce this layout in our transcriptions, since it hampers the reading of the text). According to us, it is also the absence of staccato dots in GE that could have been associated with a concern – of Chopin or of the engraver – that the notation could become illegible. To avoid any doubts, in the main text we mark these bars the same as the preceding ones.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

b. 206-209

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No staccato dots in GE & FE (→EE)

Dots suggested by editors

..

In accordance with the explanation in the note to b. 127, in the main text we suggest adding articulation markings (in square brackets) after b. 127-130 and 147-148. We also add slurs (see the adjacent note).

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 210-214

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Staccato dots in GE

No marks in FE (→EE)

..

Chopin could have added the staccato dots to [A] (→GE) after [FC], on which FE (→EE) was based, had already been finished. As was the case with b. 190-195, the difference has no impact on the performance, while in the main text we give the more accurate notation of GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources