![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 43-44
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with b. 17-18, in FE (→EE) the L.H. part octaves (from the 2nd beat of b. 43 to the end of the 1st beat of b. 44) are written in a simplified manner with the use of con 8va. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||
b. 49-50
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with b. 23-24 and analogous, we base the main text on FE, which was proofread by Chopin; we only omit the d note, which was certainly added by mistake to the A-a demisemiquaver in b. 50. That note was also abandoned by EE2 (→EE3), probably on the basis of a comparison with analogous b. 283. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Accompaniment changes , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Two rhythmic errors crept into FE1 here: at the beginning of the bar a dotted quaver and a semiquaver instead of a dotted semiquaver and demisemiquaver (in both parts) and a quaver triplet instead of a semiquaver triplet in the L.H. The latter was corrected in FE2 and EE1, while EE2 (→EE3) corrected both mistakes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 58-59
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In FE1 there is not a single category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||
b. 61-62
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The crotchets visible in the L.H. part at the beginning of b. 61 and 62 in FE1 resulted from the engraver having overlooked a quaver flag or beam. In FE2 and EE1 it was only b. 62 that was corrected, hence in that group of editions it is only EE2 (→EE3) that includes the correct text, compliant with GE1 and analogous b. 294-295. The quaver flag in b. 61 was overlooked in GE2 too. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions |