Issues : Errors in EE

b. 99

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

In EE two staccato dots on the 3rd beat of the bar were overlooked, while in GE2 the dot over a on the 2nd beat. In the main text we provide a complete set of dots after GE1 and FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE

b. 100

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

The g note instead of a in FE1 (→EE1) must be a mistake of the engraver, corrected in subsequent impressions of both editions.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , FE revisions

b. 113-124

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

In comparison with b. 83-102, the staccato dots are less carefully marked here (there are many omissions). Unlike there, it concerns GE to a greater extent; however, it does not seem that the differences between the sources and analogous places were something more than mere inaccuracies of notation. Taking into account the above, in the main text we provide all R.H. quavers and semiquavers with dots (except the octaves beginning the bars).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 122

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

c(2) in GE & EE

c(2) in FE

..

Naturals instead of flats before the last demisemiquaver (in both hands) is probably a mistake of the engraver of GE1, repeated in GE2. In turn, in EE we can assume a revision, since an analogous version with c notes is also in b. 98 there.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE

b. 147-150

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

No slurs in GE & EE

1 slur in FE

2 slurs suggested by editors

..

In accordance with the explanation in the note to b. 127, in the main text we follow FE and suggest adding a slur (in square brackets) in the second pair of bars. The missing slur in EE may be explained by an oversight of the engraver; however, due to the absence of the discussed bars in FE1, it cannot be ruled out that the slur had already been absent in that edition.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE