Issues : EE revisions
|
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In FE (→EE1) the double grace note before the 3rd crotchet in the bar is A category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 284
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest the markings of FE for the chordal section starting from the syncopated crotchet; there is a possibility to add the staccato dot from GE in analogous b. 25. At the same time, we correct the third accent, which was misplaced, i.e. it was put over the first chord in b. 284 (which is tied!). EE1 repeated the mistake of FE and also overlooked the slur (which was added in EE2). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 286
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The absence of the mark in EE1 is most probably an oversight of the engraver, corrected in EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 291-292
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 58-59, in FE1 there is not a single category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions |
-B, which is a mistake and which results in two identical notes. The error was rectified in 
-e
raising g