In FE b. 321 ends a line, while the slur reaches the last semiquaver only. However, in a new line, in b. 322 the slur clearly suggests that it should be continued. EE considered the latter to be inaccurate, whereas according to us, it is more likely that it is the slur of FE that was supposed to be continuous, like the one of GE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Inaccuracies in FE, Uncertain slur continuation
notation: Slurs