In FE the slur at the end of b. 104, which ends the page, indicates that it should be continued in the next bar. It is confirmed by the slur of FE2 in b. 105-106 (in FE1 the page containing those bars is missing); however, in EE the slurs are separated here. A possible explanation for this discrepancy could have been an oversight of the slur in b. 105-106 in FE1 – the engraver of EE1 could have considered the ending of the slur in b. 104 (without a continuation) to be inaccurate and could have shortened it, whereas the reviser added a slur in b. 105-106 later on, adjusting it to the already printed preceding slur. For this reason, we retain the slur in FE1 unfinished in bars 105-106.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions
notation: Slurs