Main text
compare
b. 109-111
The absence of the phrase mark over the second part of the phrase is most probably an oversight suggesting that [A] could have had two phrase marks in b. 107-110, like in analogous b. 31-34. However, it is only speculation, hence in the main text we give the unequivocal four-bar phrase mark of FE (→EE).
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in GE
notation: Slurs