![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in FE
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »
b. 59-61
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
In A certain verbal indications seem to be inaccurately written here: dashes marking the range of cresc. not reaching the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 61-63
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
Chopin carefully marked the range of the stretto indication with dashes – at the beginning of b. 64, one can see another dash in A, crossed-out so that the last three accented octaves were not "squished together" anymore. By an unfortunate trick of chance, the dashes were overlooked both by Fontana in FC (→GE) and the engraver of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||||||||||
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
The long accent was not reproduced in any of the editions, perhaps due to its vague placement between the first two chords in the 2nd half of the bar. According to us, in this context, the mark must be an accent and cannot concern the 2nd chord. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||
b. 73
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 24, Prelude in D minor
..
It is uncertain which staccato mark Chopin meant here; it could have influenced both Fontana and the engraver of FE to overlook it. The mark is in the form of a wedge, but it may have resulted from the hand having been moved too quickly after the dot had been written down, which is indicated by the tilt of the bottom part of the mark. In the main text we suggest the literal interpretation, i.e. wedge. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Wedges , Errors of FC |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next »