Issues : Errors in GE
b. 17
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
The version of GE1 must result from the engraver's mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 21-22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
The missing staccato dots in FC in b. 22 and in GE, in both bars, are probably an oversight of the copyist and of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Errors of FC |
||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
In GE the grace note is a g1, which is a patent mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 40-41
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
..
From b. 41 on, A (→FC) is written down in an abridged manner – it contains empty, numbered bars, which are a repetition of b. 1-8. The phrase mark in b. 40 clearly suggests that it should be continued, which we interpret (in accordance with FE) as an earlier beginning of the first phrase mark of the repeated fragment. GE did not consider the phrase mark in b. 40 at all, while in EE it starts only just on the 3rd beat of the bar; besides, both versions cannot be authentic. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE , EE inaccuracies , Inaccuracies in FC , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||
b. 41-44
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 12, Prelude in G♯ minor
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |