FC
compare
B. 10 is written in FC in an abridged manner as a repetition of b. 2, and the cresc. indication present therein was written in b. 11, perhaps to remind us that the dashes concern that very mark. GE, however, considered that version binding instead of the indication in b. 2 (10) and reproduced it literally, omitting the beginning of the crescendo in b. 10.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in FC
notation: Verbal indications