Slurs
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The missing slur in b. 10-11 and the slur in b. 12 in FE (→EE1) must be oversights of the engraver. The earlier starting point of the slur in b. 10 in GE is probably a result of the notation of FC, in which the beginning of that slur may suggest such an interpretation (Fontana probably took the bottom arm of the accent/diminuendo in A for the beginning of the slur). In EE2 the slurs were added probably after GE (in b. 10 inaccurately). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 11-12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
In the main text we give the slur of A (→FC,FE). The earlier starting point of the slur in GE is an inaccuracy of the engraver, similar to the one in the previous bar. EE1 overlooked the slur (like the two adjacent ones), which was arbitrarily completed in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in EE |
|||||||||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The slur in A, which initially reached the 5th quaver in the bar, was shortened by Chopin by one quaver. That correction was not taken into account both by Fontana and the engraver of FE – in FC and FE the slur encompasses the entire bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Corrections in A , Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||
b. 34
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The missing slur resulted from the oversights of Fontana and of the engraver of EE1. The slur was added in EE2; most probably after FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors of FC |
|||||||||||
b. 35-37
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 22, Prelude in G minor
..
The omission of three slurs in these bars is most probably a mistake of FE, while the change of the range of the slurs in b. 36-37 is probably a revision unifying them with the authentic slur in b. 35-36. However, it does not result from the notation of the manuscripts, in spite of their minor inaccuracies. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next »