FC
compare
b. 35-37
The omission of three slurs in these bars is most probably a mistake of FE, while the change of the range of the slurs in b. 36-37 is probably a revision unifying them with the authentic slur in b. 35-36. However, it does not result from the notation of the manuscripts, in spite of their minor inaccuracies.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, GE revisions
notation: Slurs