data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
The fact that the slur was overlooked both by the copyist and the engraver of FE could be explained by its shape and placement – the greater part of the slur is flat and is high above the text, closer to the bottom stave of b. 33-34 (it even intersects the 'p' letter in the pedalling markings) than the final chords in the Prelude. The fact that it is a slur is confirmed by its ending as well as by the slur over the crossed-out version of those bars.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Errors in FE, Errors of FC
notation: Slurs