- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »
b. 3-15
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
|||||
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In the sources the slur reaches only the last semiquaver in b. 6. A comparison with analogous situations in b. 2-3, 10-11 and 14-15 proves that it is almost certainly a result of inaccuracy of A. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
Holding the g note to the very end of the bar, as it was given in A and in all the remaining sources, is inconvenient from the pianistic point of view and practically imperceptible against the trill performed with pedal in the bass. Therefore, it is almost certainly a mistake of Chopin, who did not realize that in this bar – unlike in all analogous ones – the first note of the bar is not a part of the chord on the 3rd beat. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
The small slur combining the trilled crotchet with the quaver that opens the next bar was overlooked both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
|||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 10, Prelude in C♯ minor
..
In A it is unclear whether the slur encompasses d1 on the 2nd beat of the bar or whether it aims for g1 on the 3rd beat. According to us, it is the former that is more likely – the slur symmetrically encompasses the notes played on the 2nd beat of both bars, which is an argument for a symmetrical interpretation of both its ends; since the beginning of the slur undoubtedly falls on the 2nd beat of the bar, its ending is also to be interpreted so. This is how it was interpreted and clearly written down by Fontana in FC, which was, however, ignored in GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next »