![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Errors in GE
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
In the main text we include the staccato dot placed in A quite high above the 1st quaver; perhaps this is the reason it was overlooked in FE (→EE). On the basis of the preserved photograph, it is difficult to conclude whether the dot was copied in FC. According to us, it is likely that it is between the ledger lines, poorly legible due to the beam in b. 41, visible through the other page. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give the version of A (→FE→EE), which does not raise any doubts, in spite of the missing category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||||||||||
b. 33-36
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
In the main text we give a contextual interpretation of the slurring of A – we consider the bottom slur in b. 33, which closes the line, to be inaccurate, since it is too short (like in a few other places, see b. 1). The clearly extended slurs in subsequent analogous bars undoubtedly reveal Chopin's intention. However, this notation was not reproduced correctly in any of the sources, which may be explained by revision (in all cases), an erroneous interpretation (FC) or carelessness (GE). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Errors in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Errors in GE , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC , Uncertain slur continuation |
||||||||||||||
b. 50
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
..
It is difficult to indicate which element of notation of FC could have misled the engraver of GE1. The absence of a respective correction in GE2 proves that the revision was implemented with the aim of detecting manifest errors; compliance with the Stichvorlage was not the main goal. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||
b. 55
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 21, Prelude in B♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |