![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : EE revisions
b. 6-11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
As was the case in the Prelude No. 8 in F category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
In A (→FC,FE→EE1) and CGS there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
The cautionary sharp before f category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Cautionary accidentals |
|||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
In A (→FE) and CGS, there are no accidentals in the L.H. part in the entire bar. Chopin's patent inaccuracy was corrected by Fontana in FC (→GE), who added naturals lowering G category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Accidentals in different octaves , Omission of current key accidentals , Fontana's revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 9, Prelude in E major
..
The missing tie of b must be an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE1). The absence of that tie in CGS is one of the arguments proving that the copy comes from FE. The tie in EE2 was most probably drawn from GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |