data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In A (→FC,FE→EE1) and CGS there is no lowering b to b
. Chopin's mistake, obvious in this context, was corrected in GE and EE2. The fact that Chopin was convinced of the presence of b
in the preceding part of the bar is evidenced by the naturals written in A before B1 and b on the 4th beat of the bar.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, GE revisions, Omission of current key accidentals, Errors of A, Errors repeated in FE, Errors repeated in EE
notation: Pitch