![](/build/images/logo_left-en.png)
![](/build/images/pl-button.5cab5de0.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button.d3d09842.png)
![](/build/images/pomoc-button-en.5098433b.png)
Issues : Corrections in A
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
In A before the 2nd demisemiquaver in the 3rd group, one can see a crossing-out, most probably of a category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Errors resulting from corrections , Deletions in A |
|||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
The main text is the version of the sources (interpreted literally). However, the crossings-out and corrections in this figure, visible in A, allow us to assume that Chopin forgot to insert a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Errors of A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||||
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
In A one can see corrections on the 2nd beat of the bar – the R.H. figure was crossed out and rewritten on the stave above. Chopin wanted to change the enharmonic notation of the 5th and 6th demisemiquavers from f category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Chopin's hesitations , Deletions in A , Enharmonic corrections |
|||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , Cautionary accidentals , Deletions in A , Enharmonic corrections , FE revisions |
|||||
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor
..
In A the slur over b. 23, which ends the line, was extended and reaches clearly beyond the stave, which, in turn, suggests a continuation. However, the slur in b. 24 rather does not confirm that, hence the slurs in FC (→GE) are divided. The slurs in FE reproduce the ambiguous notation of A – the slur in b. 23 suggests a continuation, yet in b. 24 a new slur begins. It is also that inaccuracy that was interpreted as separate slurs, which we see in EE. In the main text we suggest a continuous slur, considering the Chopinesque correction of the slur at the end of b. 23 to be decisive. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , Corrections in A , Uncertain slur continuation |