Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Verbal indications
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Verbal indications

b. 9-12

composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor

Dashes in bars 9-10 in A (→FC)

Dashes up to mid-bar 12 in FE

Dashes up to end of bar 12 in EE

No dashes in GE

..

The missing dashes marking the range of crescendo is a frequent inaccuracy of Chopinesque first editions. In turn, it is more difficult to evaluate the extension of their range in FE (→EE). The reviser or engraver could have considered the markings in b. 12-13 () to be a natural ending of the crescendo and assumed that the missing dashes were a result of the composer's inadvertence. However, that reasoning is not as obvious as it seems at first glance – after the ascending progression in b. 9-10, based on the f pedal note, the following one and a half bar brings rather a momentary respite due to the descending sequence of half-bar cadences. Due to the above reason, in the main text we keep the version of A (→FC).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , FE revisions

b. 24-26

composition: Op. 28 No. 8, Prelude in F♯ minor

dim. - - in bar 24 in A (→FEEE)

dim. - - - in bars 24-26 in FC

No indication in GE

..

In the main text we reproduce the range of cresc. marked with dashes in accordance with the notation of A (→FEEE). Dashes running almost until the end of b. 26 in FC was an arbitrary decision of Fontana or perhaps a mistake – the dashes in FC end more or less in a place where they would have ended if they had been written in A a line lower. The omission of the entire indication in GE is a patent mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Fontana's revisions