Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||
|
b. 25-28
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
In A (→FC,FE) there are no flats lowering D to D category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
|
b. 29-32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
The missing cresc. - - - indication in FC (→GE1) is an oversight of the copyist – see the note in b. 28. The indication was added in GE2 (→GE3) presumably on the basis of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
In A one can see crossed-out category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Deletions in A , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||
|
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
In A (→FC,FE→EE1) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in EE |
instead of f, which was corrected in 
and 
before the 5th and 6th R.H. notes, which is yet another proof that the composer was convinced that accidentals were valid also in adjacent octaves (at least in such a context). The accidentals were added only in