Issues : GE revisions
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||
b. 25-28
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
In A (→FC,FE) there are no flats lowering D to D in b. 25, d2 to d2 in b. 26 and g to g in b. 28. GE and EE2 added all necessary accidentals, whereas EE1 – only those in b. 25 and 28. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||
b. 29-32
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
The missing cresc. - - - indication in FC (→GE1) is an oversight of the copyist – see the note in b. 28. The indication was added in GE2 (→GE3) presumably on the basis of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
In A one can see crossed-out and before the 5th and 6th R.H. notes, which is yet another proof that the composer was convinced that accidentals were valid also in adjacent octaves (at least in such a context). The accidentals were added only in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Deletions in A , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 19, Prelude in E♭ major
..
In A (→FC,FE→EE1) there is no raising e to e. The inaccuracy was corrected in GE and EE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in EE |