- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next »
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 7, Prelude in A major
..
Replacing non-slashed grace notes – small quavers – by slashed ones is one of the mannerisms of Fontana as a copyist. As Chopin did not strictly observe the difference between both types of grace notes, in this case both versions of notation have the same meaning. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Notation of grace notes , Fontana's revisions |
|||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 7, Prelude in A major
..
The version of FC (→GE) is most probably a mistake of Fontana. Although the shorter stem of the 3rd crotchet suggests that the additional e was added, it could not have been done by Chopin, who did not proofread FC. That version was introduced – under the influence of GE1 – also in EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors of FC |
|||
b. 15-16
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 7, Prelude in A major
..
The missing tie of the a1 minim is a mistake both in EE1 and CGS. The error of EE1 was corrected in EE2 on the basis of the Stichvorlage (FE2) or GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in CGS |
|||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 7, Prelude in A major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in CGS |
|||
b. 16
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 7, Prelude in A major
..
At the end of the Prelude one can see in A a crossed-out pedal release asterisk, which confirms that these quite frequent situations in Chopin's pieces are not accidental inaccuracies of notation. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Deletions in A , No pedal release mark |
- « Previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next »