Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 10
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The initial e1 is not marked in AI with any staccato sign. To A Chopin put a distinct staccato wedge, which was reproduced inaccurately as a dot in GE, and omitted in FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The sign begins in A still in bar 10, and ends in bar 11 on the 4th quaver. In GE (→FE→EE) it is shifted entirely into bar 11, encompassing all quavers therein. In AI, the hairpin does not appear in bars 10-11. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 11
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The quavers in AI are marked with portato dots (under a slur). Lack of dots in A (→GE→FE→EE) means probably a change to the articulation of the bar, possibly in conjunction with the vivid separation of the closing motif in bar 12. However, it cannot be ruled out that Chopin used a slur to just single out a melodic unity and left articulation nuances at the discretion of the performer. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
|||||||||||
b. 25-31
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The interpretation of the marks at the beginning of bars 25, 27 and 31 as long accents is supported by the analogy with bars 1, 3 and 7, in which Chopin in A wrote the accents in a more precise manner than he did in bars 25, 27 and 31. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |